Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    CNQ
    • Issues
      • Number 114
      • Number 113
      • Number 112
      • Number 111
      • Number 110
      • Number 109
      • Number 108
      • Number 107
      • Number 106
      • Number 105
      • Number 104
      • Number 103
      • Number 102
      • Archive
    • Magazine
      • About
      • Contests
      • Advertise
      • Submissions
      • Where to Buy
      • Subscribe
      • Promotional Subscriptions
      • Contact
    • Features
      • Web Exclusive
      • Essays
        • CanLitCrit Essay Contest
      • Interviews
      • Reviews
      • CNQ Abroad
      • Poetry
      • Short Fiction
      • The North Wing
      • The Dusty Bookcase
      • Profiles in Bookselling
      • Used and Rare
    CNQ

    Julia Cooper interviewed
    by Brad de Roo

    0
    By CNQ Team on May 11, 2017 Interviews

    In The Last Word: Reviving the Dying Art of Eulogy, the latest installment in Coach House Books’ “Exploded Views” series of “probing, provocative essays that offer surprising perspectives on the most intriguing cultural issues and figures of our day,” writer and recent doctoral recipient Julia Cooper combines cultural analysis of works ranging from Barthes to the Coen Brothers’ The Big Lebowski with personal experience in an attempt to “create a new space for the bleak act of mourning.”

    Julia Cooper

    Brad de Roo: Is The Last Word essentially a eulogy for a particular way of looking at death?

    Julia Cooper: The book is interested in this peculiar cultural ritual we perform when someone dies—which seems like a good idea on paper, but in practice often backslides into cliché and anxieties around public speaking. To do it well is an art, but one that we seem to have forgotten. I don’t want to prescribe how people should grieve, but I do want to point out some of the contradictions and restrictive time frames that exist around how we currently do it.

    The Last Word,
    by Julia Cooper
    Coach House Press
    168 pages.

    BdR: Is the process of writing, in general, akin to mourning or grieving?

    JC: I can’t speak to a general process of writing. But certainly there are some parallels you could draw between the two, like the narcissistic turn inward that both grief and writing require. As I say in the book, I don’t think that narcissism is bad or wrong. We are humans concerned with ourselves, propelled by our desires, and oftentimes introspection can be misread as arrogance or selfishness.

    BdR: I found your discussion of narcissism refreshing. You suggest that mourners often need to focus on themselves for extended periods to address the magnitude of loss and pain they are faced with. Why do you suppose we rush this process? Is mourning not considered an efficient enough use of time?

    JC: That’s exactly it. The work of mourning doesn’t count—at least in contemporary North American culture—as “work.” Though, I suggest that grieving actually is some of the hardest work we are consigned to do. One of the reasons I think that mourning is rushed is because its labour is invisible, and like you say, inefficient. There is nothing efficient about the slow, forever-work of grief and that really doesn’t jive with the demands of late capitalism (to maximize productivity, to accumulate wealth, to, above all, progress).

    BdR: Do you find the sense of time and attention required of mourning at all conducive to writing?

    JC: That’s a neat question. In one way, yes. The reflection of writing corresponds with the introspection of grief—when you’re in the writing it can feel akin to a fugue state where time and memory get a bit mixed up, elongated. But writing also comes to a close. It has its deadlines, it has readers. Published writing becomes a social thing that circulates in the world, which—try as we might to connect our loss to something bigger—intimate grief doesn’t.

    BdR: You write about the many fraught ways in which we publicly grieve today – from social media celebrity memorials to often clichéd, impersonal funeral services to popular songs. Was there any worry about getting the right tone for making public your personal experiences with grief?

    JC: I have a great editor in Emily Keeler, and I trusted her to help me strike the right tone. The Exploded Views series allows for personal voice to be braided into broader cultural analysis, so you could say I was following in the footsteps of the authors before me. Chase Joynt and Mike Hoolboom’s You Only Live Twice or Howard Akler’s Men of Action are two lovely examples.

    BdR: Would I be wrong to suggest that the celebrity death culture is an ever-burgeoning cultural industry via social media?

    There is nothing efficient about the slow, forever-work of grief and that really doesn’t jive with the demands of late capitalism (to maximize productivity, to accumulate wealth, to, above all, progress).
    JC: I talk about how celebrity-grieving has reached something of a fever pitch with social media, but also that we’ve had a penchant for since the days of Lincoln’s assassination. The pageantry of death appeals more than the heavy work of it. That’s not only because we’d rather rely on ritual than give ourselves over to the emotional labour of processing loss, but also because rituals can bring real comfort. Loss is so disorienting, and the spectacle of funeral rites can feel like anchoring points that tether you back down to earth when you’re listless, feeling like you could float away from reality altogether.

    BdR: You note that we often make a great separation between life and death in our culture—as though they exist in exclusive worlds.  What do you think normalizes this separation? Is one of the difficulties of delivering a eulogy, the navigation of this cultural divide?

    JC: I think that what normalizes this separation is our fear of death—a desire to slowly look the other way from the painful and ugly feelings that loss occasions. I get that. But looking at loss and holding some space for it can maybe help dull the abject fear it incites in us. To consider the ways that life and death are imbricated is freeing, to me at least.

    —A CNQ Web Exclusive, April 2017

     

    Related Posts

    Jean Marc Ah-Sen interviews André Forget

    Jean Marc Ah-Sen interviews Dimitri Nasrallah

    Megan Durnford interviews Jocelyne Saucier

    Comments are closed.


    CNQ Issue 114:
    Fall/Winter 2023


    Subscribe & Save! Within Canada, with free shipping:

    Subscribe & Save! Outside Canada, with free shipping:

    Recent Articles
    June 30, 2023

    On Upstart & Crow
    by Zoe Grams

    March 28, 2023

    Jana Prikryl’s Midwood
    by Andreae Callanan

    March 20, 2023

    Spring Is Here
    by David Mason

    Recent Posts
    • On Upstart & Crow
      by Zoe Grams
    • Jana Prikryl’s Midwood
      by Andreae Callanan
    • Spring Is Here
      by David Mason
    • Where East Meets West
      by J R Patterson
    • Tolu Oloruntoba’s Each One a Furnace
      by Kevin Spenst
    Recent Comments
    • theresa on Don Coles’ A Serious Call
      by David Godkin
    • Mother, Wife, Author and Professor – O'Niel Barrington Blair on Meaghan Strimas
    • Vol. 1 Brooklyn | Afternoon Bites: Yaa Gyasi Interviewed, Justin Torres Nonfiction, Janice Lee on Fritters, Karen Russell, and More on Amy Jones interviewed
      by Brad de Roo
    • Pinball: A Walking Tour by Emily Donaldson – CNQ | Fun With Bonus on Pinball: A Walking Tour
      by Emily Donaldson
    • admin on Interview with Helen Kahn
      by Jason Dickson
    Archives
    • June 2023
    • March 2023
    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • April 2022
    • January 2022
    • November 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • November 2020
    • August 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • January 2019
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    • December 2016
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • August 2016
    • July 2016
    • June 2016
    • May 2016
    • April 2016
    • March 2016
    • February 2016
    • December 2015
    • November 2015
    • July 2015
    • June 2015
    • May 2015
    • April 2015
    • March 2015
    • February 2015
    • January 2015
    • December 2014
    • November 2014
    • October 2014
    • September 2014
    • July 2014
    • May 2014
    • February 2014
    Categories
    • Archives
    • Blog
    • CanLitCrit Essay Contest
    • CNQ Abroad
    • CNQ Timeline
    • Essays
    • Exhumations
    • Features
    • First Reading
    • Interviews
    • Poetry
    • Profiles in Bookselling
    • Rereading
    • Reviews
    • Short Fiction
    • The Antiquarium
    • The Dusty Bookcase
    • The North Wing
    • Uncategorized
    • Used and Rare
    • Web Exclusive
    Meta
    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.org
    CNQ: Canadian Notes and Queries
    1686 Ottawa St.
    Windsor, ON
    N8Y 1R1
    Phone: 519-915-3930
    Email: info [at] notesandqueries [dot] ca
    Instagram: @cnandq

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.